On Candidates
For Starters, I don’t believe that Tea Party members and other conservative/libertarian grassroots organizations should spawn off into a third party movement; going the third party route would split the Conservative/Republican/Libertarian vote and by default re-elect Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House and Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. Conservatives and Libertarians, those who seek commonsense solutions to this nation’s problems, should seek to enter the Republican Party, the Original home of Conservatism, and retake it. In Republican Primaries, conservatives should throw their support behind candidates that advocate the principles of limited government and fiscal sanity at both the State and Federal level. Conservatives, Tea Party Patriots, and Commonsense Reagan democrats must remember that although Republicans have made mistakes in the past, they are the country’s only hope at the moment in turning back the tide on President Obama’s Statists agenda. When Republicans become RINO’s, republicans in name only, conservatives should run primary challengers against them; if the conservative wins the party’s conservatism will be strengthened. Even if the RINO wins the primary, the conservative running against him forces him to the Right on many positions away; a perfect example of this would be John McCain’s new found conservative stance in his primary fight with J.D. Hayworth.
On Energy and Jobs Policy
Conservatives should develop a platform by which to judge candidates running for elected office; the platform should include our positions on a variety of policy issues. On energy the concerned Americans should endorse an energy strategy, both national and at the state level, that seeks to cut our dependence on foreign energy sources by more than half. A promising reform would be to transform the way we use energy in America. Today, depending on the estimate, the US spends around $400 billion a year to import energy from nations that don’t have our best interests at heart. The United States, particularly States like Pennsylvania and Alaska are rich in domestic energy resources like oil, natural gas, and coal and by unleashing those resources the US could unleash a booming economic recovery. Candidates running for state wide offices and seeking grassroots conservative support should embrace a plan in which business tax rates are dramatically cut from their current rates; the state of Pennsylvania has a Business tax of nearly 10%, almost double the rate of Florida. The State of Florida has a flat corporate tax rate of 5.5%, providing more incentive for business development within that state and as a result Florida was able to attract a lot of new businesses to the state. Once tax rates are cut, energy rich states would have put themselves on the path to major investment in the state’s natural resources by investors looking to help America diversify its energy portfolio and lessen our dependence on foreign energy. Oil Tycoon Boone Pickens devised a plan in which America would use it vast natural gas resources to fuel and heat its vehicles and homes. For example, there are 18 million tractor trailers (trucks) traveling up and down the interstates of America delivering goods and services; these huge trucks use diesel fuel. Pickens’ estimates that by converting these trucks from Diesel (imported energy) to Natural Gas (domestic), the US could reduce its energy imports by half, bringing that money back home to reinvest in America. Pennsylvania, for example, could embark on a natural gas revolution, bringing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue to the state and employing thousands; Pennsylvania could become a catalyst for the Nation on true energy Independence. Nationally, Conservatives should seek and embrace candidates that pledge changing the way this country uses energy by diversifying into Natural Gas, Liquefied Coal, and Nuclear power.
On The Economy
Conservatives and Tea Party activists should embrace a policy stance of across the board tax cut for individuals and businesses, allowing individuals and businesses to keep more of what they earn. State and Federal officials should convene a series of meetings with leading Business owners and Business Associations to discuss the best way forward on job creation. Candidates should pledge to seek a major reduction in corporate and investment tax rates; these tax reductions should be temporary and only re-enacted if credible job gains are posted. Tax cuts are great, but all tax cuts must be accompanied by spending cuts as well; we can no longer afford to cut taxing while increasing government spending; this leads to deficits. Those running for Congress should pledge to support conservative measures for cutting federal spending. There are those who advocate cutting federal spending in half, and under normal circumstances I’d agree with that. But in understanding our dire financial situation I feel deeper cuts are necessary; however cutting spending in half is a productive start. There are measures currently being presented by Republican members of the House in which spending is capped at 20% of GDP; once again good start but capping spending at 17-18% would be better. Candidates should advocate providing tax incentives to businesses and investors willing to invest in the Manufacturing business. We need to revive manufacturing jobs in America. We should support candidates who believe in the 10 Amendment; candidates who advocate the States taking a lead role in areas such as education, transportation, emergency management, and agriculture; this would drastically reduce the need for federal spending in these areas, saving the American Taxpayer billions.
On Entitlements
The Tea Party and other concerned Commonsense America should support candidates who tell the truth about the state of our entitlement programs and who are willing to make the tough decisions regarding reform. The current recession will only pale in comparison to the coming entitlement crisis due to hit this country in just a few short years. The United States has a national debt of more than $12 Trillion and growing and on top of that staggering figure is one even direr. The WWII generation produced the Baby Boom generation, those born between WWII and the early 1960s, and this population of over 70 million Americans is beginning to retire in record numbers; the tidal wave of retirees is due to put severe strain on both Social Security and Medicare. For the next two decades, 10,000 baby boomers will retire everyday leaving the US taxpayer on the hook for more than $50 Trillion worth of promised benefits to these individuals; these are benefits promised that the government does not have the money to pay. Social Security and Medicare in their current form are unsustainable and the current system requires a total transformation. It’s time for financial well-being and medical care to be put back into the hands of the individual. Those 50 years and older, if they choose, may remain a part of a smaller version of the current system (with some reforms) if they feel they may not have enough time to save for retirement due to age. The Heritage Foundation has some tough but effective ways in which to transform this nation’s retirement system:
• Raise the retirement age (currently set to rise to 67 by 2030) by two months each year until it reaches 70, which would allow future seniors an average retirement of 17 years.
• A second option would income-adjust benefits to target needy seniors more effectively. This could be accomplished through "progressive indexing," which would index initial benefit levels for middle-income and upper-income families to price inflation rather than wage growth, eliminating much of the increased Social Security costs driven by higher benefits. This would also target more benefit growth to lower-income retirees. If accompanied by an increase in the retirement age, progressive indexing could eliminate the entire Social Security shortfall.
• Personal accounts by themselves do not reduce the taxpayer liabilities to current seniors. However, if Congress slightly pared back the growth rates of benefits for upcoming retirees and allowed workers to direct a portion of their payroll tax savings into personal retirement accounts, workers could har¬ness enough long-term investment growth to do much better than they can under today's system. This is the most realistic way to fund two genera¬tions of retirement on one generation's payroll tax. Millions of Americans with 401(k) plans and IRAs already understand how even safe investments can grow significantly over several decades
• Congress should reduce the massive Medicare Part B and Part D subsidies for upper-income families. These programs are not social insurance: Enrollees did not earn their benefits with payroll taxes. Rather, they are large subsidies from taxpayers.
• Long-term fundamental reform will likely involve bringing more choice and competition into health care, such as moving Medicare from a defined-benefit system to a defined-contribution system. The Federal Employees Health Benefits Pro¬gram (FEHBP) has held down costs by creating a voucher-type system for fed¬eral employees to purchase coverage from competing health plans that offer differing coverage and costs. By creating more choice and competi¬tion, the FEHBP has held down cost increases and may serve as a model for Medicare reform.
This election year Americans must be willing to hold candidates to the fire on this nation’s most dire issues. We must not fall for business as usual or the talking points and propaganda from the mainstream media. We must be informed and well able to challenge candidates and politicians on a variety of issues that concern us. If the American voter enters the 2010 election armed with commonsense and reason, America may just witness a rare political phenomenon not witnessed since 1994 Republican Revolution and the Reagan landslides: A Conservative Sweep. America would be the better.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Obama’s America: The Change “We The People” No Longer Believe In
Since entering office in January 2009, President Barack Obama, has done everything in his power to fundamentally transform the United States of America. America is a nation that was founded on the principles of individual freedom and liberty, personal responsibility, free market capitalism, and the idea that men were inherently free and imbued with certain rights that government can never take away. If this was what America was founded upon and Barack Obama is intent on fundamentally transforming America, then the question needing to be asked is what is he changing us into? All indicators seem to point to a Western European Social-Welfare state.
After entering the White House in 2009, the Obama Administration quickly moved to pass what we know today as the “Stimulus”. With this stimulus, or so they called it, the Administration promised the nation that unemployment would not rise above 8% and that 3-4 million new jobs would follow. Unfortunately for the president and his democrat party nothing could be further from reality. Since Barack Obama took office in January 2009 the United States has lost more 6 million jobs and “created or saved” nothing. In recent days, due to the March jobs report, the Obama Administration has been touting the 162,000 jobs created as if that were a measure of success on his jobs report card. For starter’s, 48,000 of these “new jobs” are temporary US Census jobs meaning these workers will terminated as soon as the Census is completed. For arguments sake let’s say that all 162,000 jobs were created in the private sector as a result of Obama’s spending, that would mean that on average the administration spent, or more accurately the American people spent, nearly $5 million per every job created last month. So what did the stimulus actual accomplish? A lot according to the administration and so I’ve decided to list a few of those great accomplishments. $850 million for Amtrak; $150 million for producers of honeybees; $7.6 billion for rural community investment programs (ACORN?); $400 million for global warming research; $6.2 billion for weatherization assistance; $350 million for computers for the Dept. of Agriculture; $600 million to convert federal vehicles to hybrids; $4.2 billion for neighborhood stabilization activities (ACORN?); $1.2 billion for youth summer camp; $650 million for digital converter coupons; $90 million to educate “vulnerable populations” about digital television; $3.4 million for a turtle tunnel. I need not go on, I’m sure you get the picture. What does any of this have to do with reviving a bad economy and creating jobs? And for this the President believe he deserves a “solid B” for his job as president. Mr. President, the American people would beg to differ. The unemployment rate stands at nearly 10%, as it has for a few months now, with the underemployment rate well over 20% and this President wants us to believe he is going about the people’s business? This President and his democrat congress seem to have little concern for what the people think or say; it’s as if they disdain ordinary Americans and the values they cherish.
The United States faces a debt crises unseen by past generations and as days go by that crisis worsens. The United States’ current debt on unfunded liabilities alone stands at $108,260,117,865,917 and is ticking upward by the second. For those of you looking at this number trying to figure out exactly what it is, it’s over $108 Trillion. In a breakdown of this figure we have Medicare’s unfunded liability over $75 trillion; Social Security Liabilities over $14 trillion and prescription drug liabilities over $18 trillion. The US national debt stands at $12.8 trillion and counting, with foreign powers owning an ever increasing portion of it. The nation of Japan owns $765 billion of our debt; China owns $755 billion; OPEC owns $218 billion; the United Kingdom owns $206 billion; Brazil owns $169 billion; Russia owns $124 billion. The Federal budget is on course to run a record $1.6 trillion deficit in 2010 with trillion dollar deficits following for the next 10 years. The Federal Budget, President Obama’s Budget, is also projected to add an additional $13 trillion to the national debt and to have dire effects on the economy at large. The President’s Budget would raise taxes on all Americans over the coming decade to the tune of nearly $3 trillion while simultaneously dumping on us an additional $74,000 in debt per household. This nation’s fiscal house is on fire and the President and his liberal allies in Congress are running in with gasoline instead of the water hoses.
Is the world a safer place now that Obama is President? Has his doctrine of “smart power” produced any real results? Have our adversaries grown stronger while our allies are weaken? The truth of the matter is that the world is not a safer place with Barack Obama as President, and judging from his determination to continue his failed policies I fear the world will get a lot more dangerous before it gets better, if it ever gets better. Does the Obama administration truly care rather or not the Islamic Republic of Iran acquires nuclear weapons? Or are they more concerned with the State of Israel building settlements on land everyone acknowledges will be Israel’s in any future peace settlement? Is the Obama Administration more interested in appeasing the Russians for votes they’ll never get on the UN Security Council than insuring the US maintains its arms superiority and nuclear deterrent? What are the crowning successes of this administrations foreign policy that warrant the nation’s approval? The President’s recent summit on Nuclear security produced great photo oops for the president, well except for that one of him bowing to the President of China, but what else is there to show for all the fan fair? Mexico, Canada, and Ukraine agreed to dispose of highly enriched uranium and China agreed to come to the UN Security Council table on Iranian sanctions and in the words of the President “participate”. Addressing the last point, what does it mean for China to agree to “participate” at the Security Council? The White House quickly tried to spin this into news as if China had agreed to impose sanctions on Iran; China agreed to no such thing. Most of the time when the UN Security Council meets all permanent members, meaning the US, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China “participate” in the deliberations but that doesn’t mean they vote in favor of the motion. The United States repeatedly over the past attended Security Council meetings with resolutions on the table reprimanding Israel but the US has never voted for any of them; the US was there for the sole purposes of vetoing such resolutions. With both China and Russia having lucrative trade deals with Iran totaling in the hundreds of billions, and with Russia in talks with Iran to create a Natural Gas cartel similar to OPEC, why does anyone in the White House believe they will vote to sanction Iran? Unfortunately the “successes” of smart power extent well beyond the Persian Gulf. In Eastern Europe, the nations of Poland and the Czech Republic were stunned to learn Obama decided to pull plans to install anti-ballistic missiles systems in both country’s leaving them vulnerable to Russia’s aggression. Ukraine is moving into a closer relationship with Russia as they see that the Obama Administration has no interest in helping them protect their freedoms. And the nation of Georgia, a staunch US ally, is left to fight the powerful Russian army because the President want to “reset” relations with Russia.
What’s happening to America and is our decline inevitable? America stands at a pivotal moment in time when we can either except the decline the Left in this country has sought for decades or we can retake and then remake this nation back into the image of our Founders. I believe America will choose the latter course and that a new constitutionally conservative revolution will sweep the nation as people continue to see the fruits of the destructive policies of the liberal welfare state and today’s democrat party.
After entering the White House in 2009, the Obama Administration quickly moved to pass what we know today as the “Stimulus”. With this stimulus, or so they called it, the Administration promised the nation that unemployment would not rise above 8% and that 3-4 million new jobs would follow. Unfortunately for the president and his democrat party nothing could be further from reality. Since Barack Obama took office in January 2009 the United States has lost more 6 million jobs and “created or saved” nothing. In recent days, due to the March jobs report, the Obama Administration has been touting the 162,000 jobs created as if that were a measure of success on his jobs report card. For starter’s, 48,000 of these “new jobs” are temporary US Census jobs meaning these workers will terminated as soon as the Census is completed. For arguments sake let’s say that all 162,000 jobs were created in the private sector as a result of Obama’s spending, that would mean that on average the administration spent, or more accurately the American people spent, nearly $5 million per every job created last month. So what did the stimulus actual accomplish? A lot according to the administration and so I’ve decided to list a few of those great accomplishments. $850 million for Amtrak; $150 million for producers of honeybees; $7.6 billion for rural community investment programs (ACORN?); $400 million for global warming research; $6.2 billion for weatherization assistance; $350 million for computers for the Dept. of Agriculture; $600 million to convert federal vehicles to hybrids; $4.2 billion for neighborhood stabilization activities (ACORN?); $1.2 billion for youth summer camp; $650 million for digital converter coupons; $90 million to educate “vulnerable populations” about digital television; $3.4 million for a turtle tunnel. I need not go on, I’m sure you get the picture. What does any of this have to do with reviving a bad economy and creating jobs? And for this the President believe he deserves a “solid B” for his job as president. Mr. President, the American people would beg to differ. The unemployment rate stands at nearly 10%, as it has for a few months now, with the underemployment rate well over 20% and this President wants us to believe he is going about the people’s business? This President and his democrat congress seem to have little concern for what the people think or say; it’s as if they disdain ordinary Americans and the values they cherish.
The United States faces a debt crises unseen by past generations and as days go by that crisis worsens. The United States’ current debt on unfunded liabilities alone stands at $108,260,117,865,917 and is ticking upward by the second. For those of you looking at this number trying to figure out exactly what it is, it’s over $108 Trillion. In a breakdown of this figure we have Medicare’s unfunded liability over $75 trillion; Social Security Liabilities over $14 trillion and prescription drug liabilities over $18 trillion. The US national debt stands at $12.8 trillion and counting, with foreign powers owning an ever increasing portion of it. The nation of Japan owns $765 billion of our debt; China owns $755 billion; OPEC owns $218 billion; the United Kingdom owns $206 billion; Brazil owns $169 billion; Russia owns $124 billion. The Federal budget is on course to run a record $1.6 trillion deficit in 2010 with trillion dollar deficits following for the next 10 years. The Federal Budget, President Obama’s Budget, is also projected to add an additional $13 trillion to the national debt and to have dire effects on the economy at large. The President’s Budget would raise taxes on all Americans over the coming decade to the tune of nearly $3 trillion while simultaneously dumping on us an additional $74,000 in debt per household. This nation’s fiscal house is on fire and the President and his liberal allies in Congress are running in with gasoline instead of the water hoses.
Is the world a safer place now that Obama is President? Has his doctrine of “smart power” produced any real results? Have our adversaries grown stronger while our allies are weaken? The truth of the matter is that the world is not a safer place with Barack Obama as President, and judging from his determination to continue his failed policies I fear the world will get a lot more dangerous before it gets better, if it ever gets better. Does the Obama administration truly care rather or not the Islamic Republic of Iran acquires nuclear weapons? Or are they more concerned with the State of Israel building settlements on land everyone acknowledges will be Israel’s in any future peace settlement? Is the Obama Administration more interested in appeasing the Russians for votes they’ll never get on the UN Security Council than insuring the US maintains its arms superiority and nuclear deterrent? What are the crowning successes of this administrations foreign policy that warrant the nation’s approval? The President’s recent summit on Nuclear security produced great photo oops for the president, well except for that one of him bowing to the President of China, but what else is there to show for all the fan fair? Mexico, Canada, and Ukraine agreed to dispose of highly enriched uranium and China agreed to come to the UN Security Council table on Iranian sanctions and in the words of the President “participate”. Addressing the last point, what does it mean for China to agree to “participate” at the Security Council? The White House quickly tried to spin this into news as if China had agreed to impose sanctions on Iran; China agreed to no such thing. Most of the time when the UN Security Council meets all permanent members, meaning the US, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China “participate” in the deliberations but that doesn’t mean they vote in favor of the motion. The United States repeatedly over the past attended Security Council meetings with resolutions on the table reprimanding Israel but the US has never voted for any of them; the US was there for the sole purposes of vetoing such resolutions. With both China and Russia having lucrative trade deals with Iran totaling in the hundreds of billions, and with Russia in talks with Iran to create a Natural Gas cartel similar to OPEC, why does anyone in the White House believe they will vote to sanction Iran? Unfortunately the “successes” of smart power extent well beyond the Persian Gulf. In Eastern Europe, the nations of Poland and the Czech Republic were stunned to learn Obama decided to pull plans to install anti-ballistic missiles systems in both country’s leaving them vulnerable to Russia’s aggression. Ukraine is moving into a closer relationship with Russia as they see that the Obama Administration has no interest in helping them protect their freedoms. And the nation of Georgia, a staunch US ally, is left to fight the powerful Russian army because the President want to “reset” relations with Russia.
What’s happening to America and is our decline inevitable? America stands at a pivotal moment in time when we can either except the decline the Left in this country has sought for decades or we can retake and then remake this nation back into the image of our Founders. I believe America will choose the latter course and that a new constitutionally conservative revolution will sweep the nation as people continue to see the fruits of the destructive policies of the liberal welfare state and today’s democrat party.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
The Recovery that Wasn’t
The Recovery that Wasn’t
By Jamal R. Greene
WHERE ARE THE JOBS MR. PRESIDENT
Mr. President, I think it’s time for a tutorial in Business and Economics. During the 2008 Presidential campaign, then Senator Obama, promised to repair the American economy, create millions of new jobs, fix the healthcare system, control spending, and cut the national debt. While sitting down for a serious policy interview, with Oprah (it’s come to this), the President was asked to give himself a grade for his handling of the Presidency; the President gives himself a B. Isn’t a rule of thumb not to grade one’s self? Nevertheless, most Americans, and I’m included in that number, wouldn’t give the President a B; heck he wouldn’t even get a passing grade. The President deserves a “D-“, and I’ll explain why it is not an “F” later.
For a few weeks, the story line in most mainstream media outlets was: The US Economy is in Recovery, a slow Recovery but still a Recovery. Unfortunately my fellow Americans this assumption couldn’t be further from the Truth. Last month’s jobs report, the underlying problems with home values, sky rocketing debt, low consumer and investor confidence, and Washington’s hostile business environment all give me cause to pause on the so called Recovery.
Looking at the real barometer of an economic recovery, Employment, or in this case unemployment, the US department of Labor has reported truly disheartening statistics. For the month of December the US Economy shed 85,000 jobs and the national unemployment rate remained at 10%. One of the odd things about this report is that most economist, and I’m sure the Obama Administration, were not expecting such a dismal analysis; many of them are still under the delusion that the $787 billion so called stimulus bill actually accomplished anything good. As bad as the numbers were reported by the government, they still paint a rosier picture than reality. In reality, the job crisis is far from over and this jobs report shows that on Main Street, where it counts, the recession is far from over. The Obama administration and its media allies continue to report on the unemployment figure of 10%, while ignoring the reality that the true unemployment figure is much higher. According to the report some 661,000 people left the workforce last month; these are not people who retired, these are people who have given up hope in finding a new job. Now that these 600,000 plus people are no longer looking for employment or reporting to the unemployment system, they are no longer counted. Let me say that again. Those 661,000 people who left the workforce due to the lack of opportunities are no longer being counted by the government in the unemployment figures. If these unemployed people were counted the national unemployment rate would have risen last month to 10.4%, instead of remaining at 10. The most alarming of the report was that the real unemployment rate, this is the number of unemployed plus the number of underemployed, which stands at 17.3%, up from 17.2% the previous month. Even so, the 17.3% real unemployment figure still does not take into account the 661,000 who left the workforce last month. When those people are counted the Real Unemployment rate is actually around 22%.
Back in January of 2009, President Obama and his administration claimed that the massive stimulus bill they were preparing to pass would “save or created” over 3 million jobs and that the unemployment rate would not rise above 8%. I regretfully report to the President that his plan has not succeeded. As stated earlier, the Real unemployment rate in this country stands at nearly 22%, while government statistics report the figure at 10%. Either way, both figures are higher than what that President and his team promised it would be. The president promised to create millions of jobs, but since passing his stimulus bill the United States has lost more than 3.5 million jobs. This President and this congress haven’t the slightest idea on how to create jobs in the private economy, most likely because none of them ever had to. Well for the President and his brilliant team of economic advisors, this is how jobs are created. A steady and productive economic climate is fundamental for job creation in America. Businesses and individuals are not going to invest in new business ventures when they have to deal with a federal government that is doing everything in its power to suppress growth. If you want to promote job creation, lower both personal and corporate income taxes so that people have more disposable income to save and invest. When businesses are able to keep more of the revenue they generate, the business can expand, and when business expands it hires more workers. More people working equals more tax revenue to the government.
Unfortunately the political leaders of the day, specifically the liberal ones, still chose to follow the broken economic practices of the past. Our government is lead today by those who believe in the failed economic policies of economists John Maynard Keynes. Keynes believed that the government could stimulate economic growth and job creation through spending massive amounts of money, mostly borrowed, on infrastructure and public works projects and this would somehow “jump start” the economy. This theory has been proven folly time and time again but for the sake of those unfamiliar, I’ll do it again. The problem with this theory, called Keynesianism, is that in order for the government to spend money via a “stimulus”, it first must take it out of the private economy through taxation, borrowing, or inflating the money supply. Remember, the government operates on the money tax payers pay into the treasury every year. Keynesianism is basically robbing Peter to pay Paul. The Obama administration has chosen to borrow and tax to pay for its reckless spending. During his first year, the President shattered all previous spending records for past Presidents spending an astonishing $3.5 trillion dollars with a $1.4 trillion dollar budget deficit that followed. The United States, because of the massive amounts of spending under Obama, is now projected to run Trillion dollar deficits for years to come and this is not an amount of debt any nation can sustain. Because of the massive spending, initiated by the Bush Administration, and kicked into overdrive by the Obama administration, the value of the US dollar has been put in serious jeopardy as the world’s reserve currency. When a country expands its money supply without demand first coming from the free market for those new dollars, we experience inflation. This occurs when we have too many dollars chasing too few goods; this also results in higher consumer prices. At present, the US dollar stands as the sole currency in which oil is traded on world markets and when our dollar is weak, the price of oil rises. For months there have been calls by foreign governments, most notably the Chinese and Russians, for a new world reserve currency; to abandon the US dollar. Our foreign investors and debt holders are becoming ever more alarmed at the levels of US debt and the amount of red ink already on our books. There is even talk about the US losing its AAA credit rating; this would not be a good thing. The Obama administration campaigned on a promise of no new taxes on the middle class but just recently endorsed a plan to tax the healthcare benefits of middle class to pay for his Health plan. The Obama administration also plans to raise taxes on Energy, causing energy prices for consumers to skyrocket. They plan to levy heavy taxes on corporations and small businesses, which of course is a backwards policy since businesses are the job creators in America. The Obama administration plans to increases taxes on capital gains from investments at a time when they should be cutting taxes to encourage investment. After all, businesses need people to invest capital in order for them to grow and then in turn create jobs. The President and his policies will not create the prosperity he has promised; if his policies don’t change soon I’m afraid he’ll be remembered as the President that Triple the nation’s debt and saw national unemployment rise to the levels not seen since the Great Depression.
THE HOUSING MARKET MUST BE ALLOW TO BOTTOM OUT
The root of the financial crisis that erupted in the fall of 2007 was the bursting of the housing market bubble; after the bubble burst it bleed over into the financial markets causing the US Economy to seriously hemorrhage. But how did we get here? In short, it wasn’t the “policies of George W Bush”, as democrats and certain media outlets would have the American people believe. The creation of the bubble and the resulting burst were both planned and orchestrated by the Federal Reserve Bank. For those who don’t know what the FED is, in short it is America’s central bank. It is not a government owed entity as many think; the Federal Reserve is a private bank that controls the nation’s money supply through its monetary policies. The Federal Reserve regulates and controls the money supply, and therefore large sectors of the Economy, by controlling interest rates. The two key rates the FED regulates are the Federal Funds Rate and the Discount rate; these are the rates that banks charge one another to borrow money. When the Federal Reserve raises interest rates banks borrow less because it is more expensive. When banks borrow less and save more it decreases the nation’s money supply. When the Fed lowers interest rates banks borrow more and when banks borrow more they lend more to consumers. In order to attract consumers, banks lower their rates and qualifications for credit and as consumers borrow more the nation’s money supply expands. The Federal Reserve, back in 2001, begins to lower interest rates at a dramatic pace to curve that year’s recession and the economic aftershocks of 9/11. In what they claimed was an effort to strengthen the economy, the Fed kept interest rates at historic lows for years causing banks to have a massive amount of credit to lend. The banks, with the full knowledge of the Federal Reserve, devised a way to pull the US out of its recession; they decided to create a housing boom. Banks begin to encourage non-prime or sub-prime level borrowers to apply for risky sup-prime and adjustable rate mortgages with the added carrots of low to no down payments. This caused home sales to soar resulting in the intended boom and other sectors of the economy soon begin to benefit from the nations new source of wealth. The crises in the housing market begin when the Federal Reserve, seeing signs that the economy was starting to overcook, begin to raise interest rates. During this time those individuals in sub-prime and Adjustable Rate Mortgages saw the interest rates on their mortgages balloon; leaving many with mortgages they could no longer afford. Many of these sub-prime mortgages securities were sold, sliced and dice, repackaged, and then re-sold. Let’s just say that this created many situations where many investors own a single mortgage. When borrowers begin to default on their loans and home foreclosures rose, the mortgage securities banks and investors were holding became worthless and trillions of dollars were eventually lost.
In order for the Housing market to heal, the government must allow the market to correct itself by allowing housing prices to continue to fall and then bottom out. The Current, and Previous, Administration has sought to do the exact opposite. They have appropriated billions of dollars to help homeowners in default stay in their homes. History has shown us over and over again that government intervention helps exacerbate a problem, not fix it. After the so called “Housing market bailouts”, more than half of delinquent homeowners whose mortgages were modified ended up re-defaulting within six months. Home prices are still artificially to high and as a result existing home sales are down; people are not buying because prices are too high for them to risk an investment in this still shaky market. Mr. President and Fed Chairman, reflating the housing bubble is not the answer; it’s how we got in this mess in the first place.
Finally Mr. President, the nation’s debt, for years, has been spiraling out of control, and since you’ve enter office a year ago you’ve added upwards of $1.7 Trillion to the debt with economic forecasters predicting you will more than double the national debt to more than $20 Trillion. When accounting for the outstanding promised benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, the US is on the hook for an astounding $56 Trillion, $56 Trillion that we don’t have. Mr. President you shouldn’t be trying to create another entitlement program when the 3 largest currently operating are in serious crisis and due to go bankrupt in the coming years. There are simple and free solutions, market solutions, to address the high cost of healthcare. Allowing individuals to buy health insurance across state lines would dramatically increase competition among the 1300 insurance companies across American and drive down cost. Medical malpractice reform, or Tort reform, would bring down the cost doctors charge patients since they would no longer need to carry expensive malpractice insurance to protect themselves from frivolous lawsuits. The President could also move to reform our 3rd party payer medical system and encourage individuals to purchase insurance directly from insurance companies instead of going through the employer, which would be cheaper since employers add fees to healthcare cost. Health services can be delivered to low income individuals at a fraction of what Obamacare would cost through the expansion of free clinics to treat everyday illnesses, and providing tax credits to help low income individuals purchase policies. So why not give the President an “F" on his job performance? Because he hasn’t sunken the country into complete depression, and I suspect he won’t be able too. However, Americans should not be overly optimistic about America’s economic recovery in the near future. It’s possible that the Trillions of dollars the government and the Fed are pouring into the economy will cause a slight bounce in our fortunes, but if it occurs, it’ll be short lived, and we will be headed for a “double dip recession”.
By Jamal R. Greene
WHERE ARE THE JOBS MR. PRESIDENT
Mr. President, I think it’s time for a tutorial in Business and Economics. During the 2008 Presidential campaign, then Senator Obama, promised to repair the American economy, create millions of new jobs, fix the healthcare system, control spending, and cut the national debt. While sitting down for a serious policy interview, with Oprah (it’s come to this), the President was asked to give himself a grade for his handling of the Presidency; the President gives himself a B. Isn’t a rule of thumb not to grade one’s self? Nevertheless, most Americans, and I’m included in that number, wouldn’t give the President a B; heck he wouldn’t even get a passing grade. The President deserves a “D-“, and I’ll explain why it is not an “F” later.
For a few weeks, the story line in most mainstream media outlets was: The US Economy is in Recovery, a slow Recovery but still a Recovery. Unfortunately my fellow Americans this assumption couldn’t be further from the Truth. Last month’s jobs report, the underlying problems with home values, sky rocketing debt, low consumer and investor confidence, and Washington’s hostile business environment all give me cause to pause on the so called Recovery.
Looking at the real barometer of an economic recovery, Employment, or in this case unemployment, the US department of Labor has reported truly disheartening statistics. For the month of December the US Economy shed 85,000 jobs and the national unemployment rate remained at 10%. One of the odd things about this report is that most economist, and I’m sure the Obama Administration, were not expecting such a dismal analysis; many of them are still under the delusion that the $787 billion so called stimulus bill actually accomplished anything good. As bad as the numbers were reported by the government, they still paint a rosier picture than reality. In reality, the job crisis is far from over and this jobs report shows that on Main Street, where it counts, the recession is far from over. The Obama administration and its media allies continue to report on the unemployment figure of 10%, while ignoring the reality that the true unemployment figure is much higher. According to the report some 661,000 people left the workforce last month; these are not people who retired, these are people who have given up hope in finding a new job. Now that these 600,000 plus people are no longer looking for employment or reporting to the unemployment system, they are no longer counted. Let me say that again. Those 661,000 people who left the workforce due to the lack of opportunities are no longer being counted by the government in the unemployment figures. If these unemployed people were counted the national unemployment rate would have risen last month to 10.4%, instead of remaining at 10. The most alarming of the report was that the real unemployment rate, this is the number of unemployed plus the number of underemployed, which stands at 17.3%, up from 17.2% the previous month. Even so, the 17.3% real unemployment figure still does not take into account the 661,000 who left the workforce last month. When those people are counted the Real Unemployment rate is actually around 22%.
Back in January of 2009, President Obama and his administration claimed that the massive stimulus bill they were preparing to pass would “save or created” over 3 million jobs and that the unemployment rate would not rise above 8%. I regretfully report to the President that his plan has not succeeded. As stated earlier, the Real unemployment rate in this country stands at nearly 22%, while government statistics report the figure at 10%. Either way, both figures are higher than what that President and his team promised it would be. The president promised to create millions of jobs, but since passing his stimulus bill the United States has lost more than 3.5 million jobs. This President and this congress haven’t the slightest idea on how to create jobs in the private economy, most likely because none of them ever had to. Well for the President and his brilliant team of economic advisors, this is how jobs are created. A steady and productive economic climate is fundamental for job creation in America. Businesses and individuals are not going to invest in new business ventures when they have to deal with a federal government that is doing everything in its power to suppress growth. If you want to promote job creation, lower both personal and corporate income taxes so that people have more disposable income to save and invest. When businesses are able to keep more of the revenue they generate, the business can expand, and when business expands it hires more workers. More people working equals more tax revenue to the government.
Unfortunately the political leaders of the day, specifically the liberal ones, still chose to follow the broken economic practices of the past. Our government is lead today by those who believe in the failed economic policies of economists John Maynard Keynes. Keynes believed that the government could stimulate economic growth and job creation through spending massive amounts of money, mostly borrowed, on infrastructure and public works projects and this would somehow “jump start” the economy. This theory has been proven folly time and time again but for the sake of those unfamiliar, I’ll do it again. The problem with this theory, called Keynesianism, is that in order for the government to spend money via a “stimulus”, it first must take it out of the private economy through taxation, borrowing, or inflating the money supply. Remember, the government operates on the money tax payers pay into the treasury every year. Keynesianism is basically robbing Peter to pay Paul. The Obama administration has chosen to borrow and tax to pay for its reckless spending. During his first year, the President shattered all previous spending records for past Presidents spending an astonishing $3.5 trillion dollars with a $1.4 trillion dollar budget deficit that followed. The United States, because of the massive amounts of spending under Obama, is now projected to run Trillion dollar deficits for years to come and this is not an amount of debt any nation can sustain. Because of the massive spending, initiated by the Bush Administration, and kicked into overdrive by the Obama administration, the value of the US dollar has been put in serious jeopardy as the world’s reserve currency. When a country expands its money supply without demand first coming from the free market for those new dollars, we experience inflation. This occurs when we have too many dollars chasing too few goods; this also results in higher consumer prices. At present, the US dollar stands as the sole currency in which oil is traded on world markets and when our dollar is weak, the price of oil rises. For months there have been calls by foreign governments, most notably the Chinese and Russians, for a new world reserve currency; to abandon the US dollar. Our foreign investors and debt holders are becoming ever more alarmed at the levels of US debt and the amount of red ink already on our books. There is even talk about the US losing its AAA credit rating; this would not be a good thing. The Obama administration campaigned on a promise of no new taxes on the middle class but just recently endorsed a plan to tax the healthcare benefits of middle class to pay for his Health plan. The Obama administration also plans to raise taxes on Energy, causing energy prices for consumers to skyrocket. They plan to levy heavy taxes on corporations and small businesses, which of course is a backwards policy since businesses are the job creators in America. The Obama administration plans to increases taxes on capital gains from investments at a time when they should be cutting taxes to encourage investment. After all, businesses need people to invest capital in order for them to grow and then in turn create jobs. The President and his policies will not create the prosperity he has promised; if his policies don’t change soon I’m afraid he’ll be remembered as the President that Triple the nation’s debt and saw national unemployment rise to the levels not seen since the Great Depression.
THE HOUSING MARKET MUST BE ALLOW TO BOTTOM OUT
The root of the financial crisis that erupted in the fall of 2007 was the bursting of the housing market bubble; after the bubble burst it bleed over into the financial markets causing the US Economy to seriously hemorrhage. But how did we get here? In short, it wasn’t the “policies of George W Bush”, as democrats and certain media outlets would have the American people believe. The creation of the bubble and the resulting burst were both planned and orchestrated by the Federal Reserve Bank. For those who don’t know what the FED is, in short it is America’s central bank. It is not a government owed entity as many think; the Federal Reserve is a private bank that controls the nation’s money supply through its monetary policies. The Federal Reserve regulates and controls the money supply, and therefore large sectors of the Economy, by controlling interest rates. The two key rates the FED regulates are the Federal Funds Rate and the Discount rate; these are the rates that banks charge one another to borrow money. When the Federal Reserve raises interest rates banks borrow less because it is more expensive. When banks borrow less and save more it decreases the nation’s money supply. When the Fed lowers interest rates banks borrow more and when banks borrow more they lend more to consumers. In order to attract consumers, banks lower their rates and qualifications for credit and as consumers borrow more the nation’s money supply expands. The Federal Reserve, back in 2001, begins to lower interest rates at a dramatic pace to curve that year’s recession and the economic aftershocks of 9/11. In what they claimed was an effort to strengthen the economy, the Fed kept interest rates at historic lows for years causing banks to have a massive amount of credit to lend. The banks, with the full knowledge of the Federal Reserve, devised a way to pull the US out of its recession; they decided to create a housing boom. Banks begin to encourage non-prime or sub-prime level borrowers to apply for risky sup-prime and adjustable rate mortgages with the added carrots of low to no down payments. This caused home sales to soar resulting in the intended boom and other sectors of the economy soon begin to benefit from the nations new source of wealth. The crises in the housing market begin when the Federal Reserve, seeing signs that the economy was starting to overcook, begin to raise interest rates. During this time those individuals in sub-prime and Adjustable Rate Mortgages saw the interest rates on their mortgages balloon; leaving many with mortgages they could no longer afford. Many of these sub-prime mortgages securities were sold, sliced and dice, repackaged, and then re-sold. Let’s just say that this created many situations where many investors own a single mortgage. When borrowers begin to default on their loans and home foreclosures rose, the mortgage securities banks and investors were holding became worthless and trillions of dollars were eventually lost.
In order for the Housing market to heal, the government must allow the market to correct itself by allowing housing prices to continue to fall and then bottom out. The Current, and Previous, Administration has sought to do the exact opposite. They have appropriated billions of dollars to help homeowners in default stay in their homes. History has shown us over and over again that government intervention helps exacerbate a problem, not fix it. After the so called “Housing market bailouts”, more than half of delinquent homeowners whose mortgages were modified ended up re-defaulting within six months. Home prices are still artificially to high and as a result existing home sales are down; people are not buying because prices are too high for them to risk an investment in this still shaky market. Mr. President and Fed Chairman, reflating the housing bubble is not the answer; it’s how we got in this mess in the first place.
Finally Mr. President, the nation’s debt, for years, has been spiraling out of control, and since you’ve enter office a year ago you’ve added upwards of $1.7 Trillion to the debt with economic forecasters predicting you will more than double the national debt to more than $20 Trillion. When accounting for the outstanding promised benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, the US is on the hook for an astounding $56 Trillion, $56 Trillion that we don’t have. Mr. President you shouldn’t be trying to create another entitlement program when the 3 largest currently operating are in serious crisis and due to go bankrupt in the coming years. There are simple and free solutions, market solutions, to address the high cost of healthcare. Allowing individuals to buy health insurance across state lines would dramatically increase competition among the 1300 insurance companies across American and drive down cost. Medical malpractice reform, or Tort reform, would bring down the cost doctors charge patients since they would no longer need to carry expensive malpractice insurance to protect themselves from frivolous lawsuits. The President could also move to reform our 3rd party payer medical system and encourage individuals to purchase insurance directly from insurance companies instead of going through the employer, which would be cheaper since employers add fees to healthcare cost. Health services can be delivered to low income individuals at a fraction of what Obamacare would cost through the expansion of free clinics to treat everyday illnesses, and providing tax credits to help low income individuals purchase policies. So why not give the President an “F" on his job performance? Because he hasn’t sunken the country into complete depression, and I suspect he won’t be able too. However, Americans should not be overly optimistic about America’s economic recovery in the near future. It’s possible that the Trillions of dollars the government and the Fed are pouring into the economy will cause a slight bounce in our fortunes, but if it occurs, it’ll be short lived, and we will be headed for a “double dip recession”.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
The Rebirth of Islamic Terrorism
The Rebirth of Islamic Terrorism
By Jamal Greene
You would have had to be living under a rock over the Christmas Holiday if you haven’t heard by now that there was an attempted hijack of a Northwest Airlines plane by a Nigerian Islamists by the name of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. The suspect, western educated and according to media reports, living the good life, boarded the flight going to Detroit, which by the way has the largest Muslim population of any American city, in an attempt to detonate an explosive device and take down the plan along with its 300 passengers. Luckily, the plot was foiled, not by the Obama Administration, but by a courageous passenger on board. This incident, along with the terrorists acts of Fort Hood, leave me to believe that in this “age of terrorism”, we are more vulnerable, not safer, under the watchful eye of the Obama White House. Say what you will, but after the 9/11 attacks, President Bush and his national security team put measures in place to protect America, both domestic and our international interests. President Bush understood the nature of the threat we faced and he was determined that it would not happen again on his watch, and it didn’t. There were no more domestic terrorist’s attacks that occurred on Bush’s watch because of the robust, and often controversial, remedies he put in place. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the Terror surveillance programs, enhance terrorists interrogations, the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the detention of terrorist in Guantanamo Bay are all measure put in place to keep American safe; all of which have been undermined by the current administration.
Since President Obama took office in January of this year, the nation has had to deal with the tragedy of Ft Hood, the first executed Terror attack on this country since 9/11, and a kind of complacency from the President in the war against Terror. President Obama and his team would benefit from studying the history of the Fundamentalists Islamic Movement and the ideals that guide them.
At times I find it hard to believe that this movement is fueled by only a small sect of Islam, and that the overwhelming majority of Muslims are peace loving disciples of the Prophet; the evidence tends to point to the contrary. The Origins of the Contemporary Fundamentalists Islamic movement has it genesis in the 18th century, in what is now modern day Saudi Arabia. In the 1700s, there was a man by the name of Mohammad Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab, who after studying in the Iraqi city of Basra, came to the conclusion that Islam had become too modern and this modernity was not what the Prophet had intended. He preached a puritanical version of Islam which called for a return to Fundamentals and strict interpretation of the Sharia, or Islamic Law. Originally this version of Islam was rejected by the inhabitants of Arabia because most of them were pagans and had no concept of the “one God”; this doctrine was foreign to them. Wahhab’s fortune changed after meeting Muhammad Ibn Saud; the two formed an alliance in which they would retake Arabia by both the Sword and Quran. Saud would become the head of state and Wahhab the architect of social society; that state would become known as The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, a stated US ally, is also one of the leading state sponsors of terror around the world; after all 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia’s oil revenue routinely goes to fund racial madrasahs, or religious schools, where anti Americanism is preached and hatred against Israel and Non-Wahhabi Muslims is nurtured. Many of the Saudi princes and oil Sheiks regularly invest in the proselytizing of non-Fundamentalists and non-Muslims throughout the Muslim world and Europe. However, the man credited with the modern rise of radical Islam is an Egyptian by the name of Sayyid Qutb. Qutb, an Egyptian born writer and later political prisoner, who after spending time in America and learning of American democracy and civil society, decided that it was because of Classical Liberalism that the world was in decay and that a return to fundamentalists Islam was necessary. In what some consider to be his master work, Milestone, Qutb articulated the need for a reemergence of Jihad, or Holy War; no longer would it mean the inner struggle against personal demons, Jihad became the war cry of Extremists throughout the Muslim world. Libya, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and now Yemen are some of the biggest sponsors of terrorism on the planet and Anti Americanism isn’t receding in some of these countries, it’s increasing.
The history of contemporary Islamic terrorism is something that every free man should be cognitive of, after all, those who forget the lessons of History are due to repeat its failures. The US government must realize that these are not people that can be persuaded or negotiated with. Islamists see their only mission and purpose in life is Jihad; and no amount of incentives will convince them to change their minds. The Islamists sees their mission as divinely order and orchestrated; and believe it or not, they fear the eternal retribution of Allah more than the AK-47’s carried by Western forces. Just a few of the attacks are as follows:
November 1979 - Hostages taken at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran
April 1983 - Bombing of U.S. Embassy in Beirut
October 1983 - Bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut
December 1983 - Bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait
June 1985 - Hijacking of TWA Flight 847
December 1988 - Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103
February 1993 – World Trade Center Bombing
August 1998 – African Embassy Bombings
December 2000 – USS Cole Bombing
September 2001 – 9/11 Attacks
This list is a very short list when chronicling the thousands, over 9000 since 9/11, terror attacks throughout the world. Everyday Radicals are planning the demise of America and our way of life. To defeat this enemy we must remain of the offensive; we must seek out and destroyed terror cells worldwide targeting them both financially and militarily. Under President Bush, the Treasury began to track, freeze, and seize assets under American jurisdiction that was found to be aiding terrorism and thankfully President Obama has continued some of these policies. However if the President wants to avoid another situation like the attempted Detroit bombing or even worse, another 9/11, he would be wise to embrace more of the Bush/Cheney national security policies implemented after 9/11; after all they worked. Terrorist surveillance programs should be increased, faster location and seizing of Terrorist assets is needed, along with a policy to deal aggressively with nations that support and harbor terrorists. The US must not lose heart in this, the epic battle that will determine the future of Western Civilization as we know it. The US must defeat the Taliban in both Afghanistan and Pakistan and deny them a safe haven anywhere on the planet. This is not something the US can do alone; we need support: economically, diplomatically, and militarily from our allies, after all their way of life also hangs in the balance. We must remember that Freedom and Liberty are fragile things and are never more than one generation away from extinction.
By Jamal Greene
You would have had to be living under a rock over the Christmas Holiday if you haven’t heard by now that there was an attempted hijack of a Northwest Airlines plane by a Nigerian Islamists by the name of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. The suspect, western educated and according to media reports, living the good life, boarded the flight going to Detroit, which by the way has the largest Muslim population of any American city, in an attempt to detonate an explosive device and take down the plan along with its 300 passengers. Luckily, the plot was foiled, not by the Obama Administration, but by a courageous passenger on board. This incident, along with the terrorists acts of Fort Hood, leave me to believe that in this “age of terrorism”, we are more vulnerable, not safer, under the watchful eye of the Obama White House. Say what you will, but after the 9/11 attacks, President Bush and his national security team put measures in place to protect America, both domestic and our international interests. President Bush understood the nature of the threat we faced and he was determined that it would not happen again on his watch, and it didn’t. There were no more domestic terrorist’s attacks that occurred on Bush’s watch because of the robust, and often controversial, remedies he put in place. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the Terror surveillance programs, enhance terrorists interrogations, the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the detention of terrorist in Guantanamo Bay are all measure put in place to keep American safe; all of which have been undermined by the current administration.
Since President Obama took office in January of this year, the nation has had to deal with the tragedy of Ft Hood, the first executed Terror attack on this country since 9/11, and a kind of complacency from the President in the war against Terror. President Obama and his team would benefit from studying the history of the Fundamentalists Islamic Movement and the ideals that guide them.
At times I find it hard to believe that this movement is fueled by only a small sect of Islam, and that the overwhelming majority of Muslims are peace loving disciples of the Prophet; the evidence tends to point to the contrary. The Origins of the Contemporary Fundamentalists Islamic movement has it genesis in the 18th century, in what is now modern day Saudi Arabia. In the 1700s, there was a man by the name of Mohammad Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab, who after studying in the Iraqi city of Basra, came to the conclusion that Islam had become too modern and this modernity was not what the Prophet had intended. He preached a puritanical version of Islam which called for a return to Fundamentals and strict interpretation of the Sharia, or Islamic Law. Originally this version of Islam was rejected by the inhabitants of Arabia because most of them were pagans and had no concept of the “one God”; this doctrine was foreign to them. Wahhab’s fortune changed after meeting Muhammad Ibn Saud; the two formed an alliance in which they would retake Arabia by both the Sword and Quran. Saud would become the head of state and Wahhab the architect of social society; that state would become known as The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, a stated US ally, is also one of the leading state sponsors of terror around the world; after all 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia’s oil revenue routinely goes to fund racial madrasahs, or religious schools, where anti Americanism is preached and hatred against Israel and Non-Wahhabi Muslims is nurtured. Many of the Saudi princes and oil Sheiks regularly invest in the proselytizing of non-Fundamentalists and non-Muslims throughout the Muslim world and Europe. However, the man credited with the modern rise of radical Islam is an Egyptian by the name of Sayyid Qutb. Qutb, an Egyptian born writer and later political prisoner, who after spending time in America and learning of American democracy and civil society, decided that it was because of Classical Liberalism that the world was in decay and that a return to fundamentalists Islam was necessary. In what some consider to be his master work, Milestone, Qutb articulated the need for a reemergence of Jihad, or Holy War; no longer would it mean the inner struggle against personal demons, Jihad became the war cry of Extremists throughout the Muslim world. Libya, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and now Yemen are some of the biggest sponsors of terrorism on the planet and Anti Americanism isn’t receding in some of these countries, it’s increasing.
The history of contemporary Islamic terrorism is something that every free man should be cognitive of, after all, those who forget the lessons of History are due to repeat its failures. The US government must realize that these are not people that can be persuaded or negotiated with. Islamists see their only mission and purpose in life is Jihad; and no amount of incentives will convince them to change their minds. The Islamists sees their mission as divinely order and orchestrated; and believe it or not, they fear the eternal retribution of Allah more than the AK-47’s carried by Western forces. Just a few of the attacks are as follows:
November 1979 - Hostages taken at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran
April 1983 - Bombing of U.S. Embassy in Beirut
October 1983 - Bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut
December 1983 - Bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait
June 1985 - Hijacking of TWA Flight 847
December 1988 - Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103
February 1993 – World Trade Center Bombing
August 1998 – African Embassy Bombings
December 2000 – USS Cole Bombing
September 2001 – 9/11 Attacks
This list is a very short list when chronicling the thousands, over 9000 since 9/11, terror attacks throughout the world. Everyday Radicals are planning the demise of America and our way of life. To defeat this enemy we must remain of the offensive; we must seek out and destroyed terror cells worldwide targeting them both financially and militarily. Under President Bush, the Treasury began to track, freeze, and seize assets under American jurisdiction that was found to be aiding terrorism and thankfully President Obama has continued some of these policies. However if the President wants to avoid another situation like the attempted Detroit bombing or even worse, another 9/11, he would be wise to embrace more of the Bush/Cheney national security policies implemented after 9/11; after all they worked. Terrorist surveillance programs should be increased, faster location and seizing of Terrorist assets is needed, along with a policy to deal aggressively with nations that support and harbor terrorists. The US must not lose heart in this, the epic battle that will determine the future of Western Civilization as we know it. The US must defeat the Taliban in both Afghanistan and Pakistan and deny them a safe haven anywhere on the planet. This is not something the US can do alone; we need support: economically, diplomatically, and militarily from our allies, after all their way of life also hangs in the balance. We must remember that Freedom and Liberty are fragile things and are never more than one generation away from extinction.
Saturday, December 19, 2009
2010 Predictions
2010 Congressional Race Predictions
As of this moment I'm looking over the latest poll from Battleground, a truly Bipartisan polling group, and the results are very promising for Conservatives, and if the GOP stays to its conservative ideals, it promises to be a great year for them as well. In the latest Battleground Poll, 63% of Americans now consider themselves "somewhat" to "very" conservative. Compared to 33% who self identify as "somewhat" or "very" liberal. And for all the Republicans who think the GOP should be a "big tent" party and compromise conservative ideals for "moderates", the Poll reports that only 1% of Americans consider themselves Moderate. No the GOP must be the place where conservatism, both Fiscal and national security matters, is the prevailing ideology. The Battleground Poll, for the first time in a long time, has the GOP leading democrats on Generic Ballot match ups. Several other polling houses have also released polling showing the GOP winning on the generic congressional ballots, Rasmussen has the GOP up by 7. Dick Morris predicts the GOP could take as many as 100 House seats and 11 senate seats; that would be the biggest earthquake in moderate political history.. And Rove sees 8 or 9 senate seats for the GOP. I think the GOP will hold all their seats in the House and gain 55-60, making John Boehner Speaker of the House and giving the GOP at least 232 seats. I predict the GOP will hold its current Senate seats and gain 8 seats. The GOP will win Arkansas, Delaware, North Dakota, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Colorado, and believe it or not New York ( yes, Hillary's seat). I call NY because it all the polling I've seen, Gillibrand is a weak candidate, she doesn't even have the support of the democrat liberal base in NY. Rudy Giuliani beats Gillibrand hands down in the polling I'm looking at. Rep. Peter King (R) also polls very well against Gillibrand.
House Seats: 55-60
Senate: 8
But I hope Dick Morris is right and the GOP wins 100 House seats and 11 senate seats..
:-)
House Seats: 55-60
Senate: 8
But I hope Dick Morris is right and the GOP wins 100 House seats and 11 senate seats..
:-)
Friday, December 18, 2009
Anthropogenic global warming is a FRAUD
Anthropogenic global warming is a FRAUD
With my background in studying both domestic and International politics affairs, I tended to write my commentary on issues such as the US war against international terrorism, US-China relations, US-Mideast relations, the US Economy, and Congresses legislative agenda. The arguments and controversy surrounding Anthropogenic Global Warming, better known as Man Made global warming, have not, up until recently, been on my radar. However in the light of the controversy I decided to dig deeper for myself to see the so called Proof behind the theory of man made global warming and as expected it was serious flawed and left unanswered many questions. I originally speculated problems with the theory because it was advanced by liberals, worldwide, so of course it was a hoax.
We have witnessed the most recent scandal of “climategate”, in which UN scientists and proponents of man made global warming emails were hacked into an released to the public. In the emails the scientists discuss the fact that they cannot explain the decades long “COOL” in global temperatures and they also seek to discredit any other scientist who disagreed with them. The emails became public only a few weeks ago ahead of a world summit on Climate Change that has produced nothing except vague promises and lawless agreements. China, India, and South Africa, the nations in which the President personally met with during the summit, refuse to sign on to harsh admissions reductions that they know will strangle their economy’s all the sake of bad science. Governments worldwide understand the fragility of the claim of man made global warming and it is believed by some the it was the Russian government that actually hacked into the emails and had the released because Russia too is a opponent of repressive emissions cuts that will hinder economic growth.
One of the first things I realized that helped me understand the sham of this theory is that according to NASA reports the Sun’s temperature fluctuates and around the same time the temperatures on Earth start to rise, so has the temperatures on Mars and Jupiter. Last time I check, there are no people living on these planets; no SUV’s; no airplanes. The temperature rise was accredited to increased solar activity, which is what many scientists believed happened with earth’s temperatures. The Sun is the ultimate regulator for global temperatures, not man. Contrary to global warming alarmist, the 1990s were NOT the warmest decade of the 20th century, the 1930s were; and that was long before the advent of the supposed carbon polluting world we live in now. The earth’s most recent actual warming period took place over 1,000 years ago in what is referred to as the Medieval warming period; temperature then were significantly higher than what they are today and of course that was many centuries before the Industrial age came into being. The Ice caps are not melting at the alarming rate that AL Gore says they are; according to NASA Artic ice volume INCREASED by 500,000 sq km in 2008 over 2007 levels. Another interesting fact is that after World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded carbon emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940; global warming scientists still fail to explain this. Anthropogenic global warming is a Fraud, a Hoax, plain and simple. There is overwhelming scientific evidence that suggest this is a hoax, I’ve just named a few examples. With that said, the current Regime in Washington DC have their eyes set on passing an ambitious, JOB KILLING cap and trade bill under the disguise of fighting Global warming. Cap and trade will hurt the poor and the middle class as Obama has already promised that if Cap and Trade are passed, I quote “people’s electric bills would skyrocket”. High energy bills don’t hurt wealthy people because they have the money to pay it; it’s the middle class that will suffer. What is Cap and Trade? The basics of cap and trade are it is a system in which the government sets a limit on the amount of CO2 or Carbon individuals and businesses are allowed to emit. People emit carbon through driving cars, flying on planes, burning coal, and breathing. Carbon is a natural gas in our atmosphere and plants need it to produced the Oxygen that we humans breathe. The government will Cap or limit the amount of Carbon will all can emit. This means limits on driving, flying, and energy development and the only way to emit more carbon than allotted is for a person or business to Purchase “carbon credits”. Exceeding carbon limits would be against the law and Americans would be fined or jailed for non compliance, kind of like ObamaCare. And guess who is one of the leading investors in Carbon credits, THE OIL COMPANIES! I would think liberals would be outraged since they seem to collectively hate corporations, especially big oil. Well Exxon Mobile is one of the biggest Carbon credit investors and will be a supplier of these credits and stand to make BILLIONS. Under cap and trade, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
With my background in studying both domestic and International politics affairs, I tended to write my commentary on issues such as the US war against international terrorism, US-China relations, US-Mideast relations, the US Economy, and Congresses legislative agenda. The arguments and controversy surrounding Anthropogenic Global Warming, better known as Man Made global warming, have not, up until recently, been on my radar. However in the light of the controversy I decided to dig deeper for myself to see the so called Proof behind the theory of man made global warming and as expected it was serious flawed and left unanswered many questions. I originally speculated problems with the theory because it was advanced by liberals, worldwide, so of course it was a hoax.
We have witnessed the most recent scandal of “climategate”, in which UN scientists and proponents of man made global warming emails were hacked into an released to the public. In the emails the scientists discuss the fact that they cannot explain the decades long “COOL” in global temperatures and they also seek to discredit any other scientist who disagreed with them. The emails became public only a few weeks ago ahead of a world summit on Climate Change that has produced nothing except vague promises and lawless agreements. China, India, and South Africa, the nations in which the President personally met with during the summit, refuse to sign on to harsh admissions reductions that they know will strangle their economy’s all the sake of bad science. Governments worldwide understand the fragility of the claim of man made global warming and it is believed by some the it was the Russian government that actually hacked into the emails and had the released because Russia too is a opponent of repressive emissions cuts that will hinder economic growth.
One of the first things I realized that helped me understand the sham of this theory is that according to NASA reports the Sun’s temperature fluctuates and around the same time the temperatures on Earth start to rise, so has the temperatures on Mars and Jupiter. Last time I check, there are no people living on these planets; no SUV’s; no airplanes. The temperature rise was accredited to increased solar activity, which is what many scientists believed happened with earth’s temperatures. The Sun is the ultimate regulator for global temperatures, not man. Contrary to global warming alarmist, the 1990s were NOT the warmest decade of the 20th century, the 1930s were; and that was long before the advent of the supposed carbon polluting world we live in now. The earth’s most recent actual warming period took place over 1,000 years ago in what is referred to as the Medieval warming period; temperature then were significantly higher than what they are today and of course that was many centuries before the Industrial age came into being. The Ice caps are not melting at the alarming rate that AL Gore says they are; according to NASA Artic ice volume INCREASED by 500,000 sq km in 2008 over 2007 levels. Another interesting fact is that after World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded carbon emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940; global warming scientists still fail to explain this. Anthropogenic global warming is a Fraud, a Hoax, plain and simple. There is overwhelming scientific evidence that suggest this is a hoax, I’ve just named a few examples. With that said, the current Regime in Washington DC have their eyes set on passing an ambitious, JOB KILLING cap and trade bill under the disguise of fighting Global warming. Cap and trade will hurt the poor and the middle class as Obama has already promised that if Cap and Trade are passed, I quote “people’s electric bills would skyrocket”. High energy bills don’t hurt wealthy people because they have the money to pay it; it’s the middle class that will suffer. What is Cap and Trade? The basics of cap and trade are it is a system in which the government sets a limit on the amount of CO2 or Carbon individuals and businesses are allowed to emit. People emit carbon through driving cars, flying on planes, burning coal, and breathing. Carbon is a natural gas in our atmosphere and plants need it to produced the Oxygen that we humans breathe. The government will Cap or limit the amount of Carbon will all can emit. This means limits on driving, flying, and energy development and the only way to emit more carbon than allotted is for a person or business to Purchase “carbon credits”. Exceeding carbon limits would be against the law and Americans would be fined or jailed for non compliance, kind of like ObamaCare. And guess who is one of the leading investors in Carbon credits, THE OIL COMPANIES! I would think liberals would be outraged since they seem to collectively hate corporations, especially big oil. Well Exxon Mobile is one of the biggest Carbon credit investors and will be a supplier of these credits and stand to make BILLIONS. Under cap and trade, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Healthcare in America... Why Obama's plan is wrong for America
The RIGHT Perspective:
Healthcare in America
Written by: Jamal Greene
The hottest and most contentious topic in politics today, and I believe for the coming months, is Healthcare Reform, or should I say, “Health Insurance Reform”. From the congressional town halls that dominated the 24-hour news cycles during the recent recess, to the heated debates televised on “Meet the Press” and “This Week”, health insurance reform, as prescribed by the Obama administration, has ignited a fire among the American people. Both sides, Liberals and Conservatives, all agree that we need some sort of health reform in the United States; we simply have different methods of getting there. First, let’s discuss the problems with the Democrat proposal:
1. Cost
Cost is one of the biggest problems with Democrat’s health insurance reform legislation. The CBO has estimated that the House Democrats’ bill will cost the American between $900 billion and $1 trillion over the next ten years, but that, of course, is a low estimate. The President proposed back in February what he referred to as a “healthcare reserve fund” in the amount of $634 billion to be used as a “down payment” for a universal healthcare system. Combining his $634 billion start-up with what the CBO estimates it would cost annually to run such a program, we are already close to $1.7 trillion over ten years; and that’s still a low estimate since we have been shown time and time again that NO federal program comes in at its original budget forecast. Another point of interest is how the congressional democrats came to the $1 trillion figure. Conservative think tanks and a few liberal ones, such as the Urban Institute, all scored the House bill and came to a cost of $2 trillion or more. So, why the disparity in the numbers? Simple, the House democrats are using an old budgetary trick to hide the true cost. For example, Congress is launching a new entitlement program, such as healthcare reform, and they estimate the cost to be $1 trillion over the next 10 years; however, they don’t plan to launch the program until year six, halfway through the ten year period. So, let’s say the program was to run from the FY 2010-2019 (fiscal years) (actually ending in 2020), but congress decides to delay the program from “officially” starting until year six, seemingly cutting the actual cost in half, right? Wrong. The cost of the program is around $200 billion, so if the program is delayed to start 5 years out, the cost given by the congress is only through FY 2014- 2019: $1 trillion. However, this is an illusion because the bill is budgeted for ten years and will be funded for ten years; just not from FY 2010-2019. In simple terms, the first five years are eventually tacked onto the back end of the program.
In the context of a $14 trillion dollar economy, what’s the problem with spending $2 trillion on a universal healthcare system? The problem is the mounting US debt. There have been voices crying out regarding the staggering US debt—from members of Congress to world renowned economist—but none, in my opinion, has been more effective in articulating the seriousness of our debt as former US Comptroller General David Walker. In his words, I quote, “A tsunami is building and ready to hit future generations, but this one won’t be set off by earthquakes or other natural disasters. Instead, it will be a fiscal calamity created by the failure of government and business leaders to deal with the financial drain of millions of retiring baby boomers.” The national debt now stands at over $11 trillion and is growing fast, day after day with no end in sight. Along with the $11 trillion in debt we also have outstanding liabilities for both Medicare and Medicaid totaling over $53 trillion dollars; benefits we have promised, but cannot pay. The first of the baby boomer generation, those born between 1946-1964, totaling near 79 million, began to retire in 2008 with the youngest of the group reaching 65 in 2030. The outstanding cost associated with the retiring of such a massive amount of people is unthinkable; and, at present, unfunded. The benefits promised to these individuals via Medicare and Social Security is where the $53 trillion figure comes from. With the US already having a national debt of over $11 trillion with every indication that it will reach $12 trillion in the coming years, how are we to fund entitlement programs in the red for $53 trillion dollars? The answer is: we can’t. The sad reality is that many seniors, and those soon to be, will not receive all the benefits they have been promised.
2. Healthcare Rations
The problem with creating such a government behemoth like a universal health insurance is that it has no choice but to lead to rationing of healthcare. In plain terms, the US healthcare system is stretched thin at present. An average wait in an emergency room is anywhere from 3-6 hours depending on your location and the severity of your ailment; I should know. I was recently in one with my partner, the wait was over 5 hours, and we have good health insurance. The healthcare industry is lacking the professionals it desperately needs, mainly doctors and nurses, to efficiently treat patients. This is a major constraint on the healthcare industry. Nationally, we have about 800,000 doctors growing at a minuscule rate of 1% annually, with nurses numbering about 1.4 million. Stretching this limited pool of professionals to care for an additional 47 million people will, in fact, lead to the most severe types of rationing of care. And with most of the healthcare cost from individuals coming at the end of life versus the beginning, who do you think will be most affected by rationing? The Elderly. That’s right… throw grandma under the bus. Ponder this scenario (keeping in mind that one of the main reasons the democrats give for a universal system is to restrain cost): There is a waiting list for a liver transplant and at present there are two individuals on the list: one the age of 28 and the other 64. Under a universal system that is specifically designed to curve cost, the government would mandate the 28 year-old receive the life saving transplant; not the 64 year-old. The reason is that, in the eyes of a government bureaucracy, the 28 year-old is seen as a better “investment”. The 28 year-old has more to contribute via a life of taxation, while the 64 year-old is nearing retirement. It’s an easy call for a bureaucrat whose main objective is to cut cost and generate revenue for the government. Sorry, Grandma. The scenario I used is fictional, but is a real possibility under a government-run health system. There have been hundreds of healthcare horror stories from individuals that live in countries that provide government healthcare and they are not pretty.
3. Medicare Cuts to Seniors
In the house democrat bill there is a provision to cut nearly 10% from Medicare over the coming years, adversely affecting those who have labored their entire lives and thought that they were entering into their golden years with a sense of security: Our Seniors. Not only will many of them receive less than stellar social security benefits, if any, but they will now be forced by the federal government to accept a lower quality of healthcare due to insufficient funding. Medicare barely covers the medical expenses for most seniors today; this is why the government allows seniors to combine Medicare coverage with “private” supplemental plans. But, if the Democrats get their way, Medicare will be cut by 10% and the ones who will suffer most will be the elderly. Why? Unbeknownst to most people, Medicare is not an “optional” healthcare plan for seniors; it is federally mandated. Senior citizens are automatically enrolled in Medicare once they reach the age of availability, whether they want to be or not. So, we force seniors into a system that is insufficient to care for their needs and then, on top of that, tell them we are cutting 10% of the funding?
In my next article on healthcare I will outline a conservative prospective with free market and cost effective solutions for healthcare reform in America. Contrasting points of view are encouraged. This issue is too serious for any of us to sit out on the sidelines…
Article posted courtesy of Jamal Greene and appears in eXcapethematriX magazine, Sept 09 issue
Healthcare in America
Written by: Jamal Greene
The hottest and most contentious topic in politics today, and I believe for the coming months, is Healthcare Reform, or should I say, “Health Insurance Reform”. From the congressional town halls that dominated the 24-hour news cycles during the recent recess, to the heated debates televised on “Meet the Press” and “This Week”, health insurance reform, as prescribed by the Obama administration, has ignited a fire among the American people. Both sides, Liberals and Conservatives, all agree that we need some sort of health reform in the United States; we simply have different methods of getting there. First, let’s discuss the problems with the Democrat proposal:
1. Cost
Cost is one of the biggest problems with Democrat’s health insurance reform legislation. The CBO has estimated that the House Democrats’ bill will cost the American between $900 billion and $1 trillion over the next ten years, but that, of course, is a low estimate. The President proposed back in February what he referred to as a “healthcare reserve fund” in the amount of $634 billion to be used as a “down payment” for a universal healthcare system. Combining his $634 billion start-up with what the CBO estimates it would cost annually to run such a program, we are already close to $1.7 trillion over ten years; and that’s still a low estimate since we have been shown time and time again that NO federal program comes in at its original budget forecast. Another point of interest is how the congressional democrats came to the $1 trillion figure. Conservative think tanks and a few liberal ones, such as the Urban Institute, all scored the House bill and came to a cost of $2 trillion or more. So, why the disparity in the numbers? Simple, the House democrats are using an old budgetary trick to hide the true cost. For example, Congress is launching a new entitlement program, such as healthcare reform, and they estimate the cost to be $1 trillion over the next 10 years; however, they don’t plan to launch the program until year six, halfway through the ten year period. So, let’s say the program was to run from the FY 2010-2019 (fiscal years) (actually ending in 2020), but congress decides to delay the program from “officially” starting until year six, seemingly cutting the actual cost in half, right? Wrong. The cost of the program is around $200 billion, so if the program is delayed to start 5 years out, the cost given by the congress is only through FY 2014- 2019: $1 trillion. However, this is an illusion because the bill is budgeted for ten years and will be funded for ten years; just not from FY 2010-2019. In simple terms, the first five years are eventually tacked onto the back end of the program.
Ponder this scenario: There is a waiting list for a liver transplant and, at present, there are two individuals
on the list: one the age of 28 and the other 64. Under a universal system that is specifically designed to curve
cost, the government would mandate the 28 year-old receive the life saving transplant; not the 64 year-old…
The 28 year-old has more to contribute via a life of taxation, while the 64 year-old is nearing retirement…
on the list: one the age of 28 and the other 64. Under a universal system that is specifically designed to curve
cost, the government would mandate the 28 year-old receive the life saving transplant; not the 64 year-old…
The 28 year-old has more to contribute via a life of taxation, while the 64 year-old is nearing retirement…
In the context of a $14 trillion dollar economy, what’s the problem with spending $2 trillion on a universal healthcare system? The problem is the mounting US debt. There have been voices crying out regarding the staggering US debt—from members of Congress to world renowned economist—but none, in my opinion, has been more effective in articulating the seriousness of our debt as former US Comptroller General David Walker. In his words, I quote, “A tsunami is building and ready to hit future generations, but this one won’t be set off by earthquakes or other natural disasters. Instead, it will be a fiscal calamity created by the failure of government and business leaders to deal with the financial drain of millions of retiring baby boomers.” The national debt now stands at over $11 trillion and is growing fast, day after day with no end in sight. Along with the $11 trillion in debt we also have outstanding liabilities for both Medicare and Medicaid totaling over $53 trillion dollars; benefits we have promised, but cannot pay. The first of the baby boomer generation, those born between 1946-1964, totaling near 79 million, began to retire in 2008 with the youngest of the group reaching 65 in 2030. The outstanding cost associated with the retiring of such a massive amount of people is unthinkable; and, at present, unfunded. The benefits promised to these individuals via Medicare and Social Security is where the $53 trillion figure comes from. With the US already having a national debt of over $11 trillion with every indication that it will reach $12 trillion in the coming years, how are we to fund entitlement programs in the red for $53 trillion dollars? The answer is: we can’t. The sad reality is that many seniors, and those soon to be, will not receive all the benefits they have been promised.
2. Healthcare Rations
The problem with creating such a government behemoth like a universal health insurance is that it has no choice but to lead to rationing of healthcare. In plain terms, the US healthcare system is stretched thin at present. An average wait in an emergency room is anywhere from 3-6 hours depending on your location and the severity of your ailment; I should know. I was recently in one with my partner, the wait was over 5 hours, and we have good health insurance. The healthcare industry is lacking the professionals it desperately needs, mainly doctors and nurses, to efficiently treat patients. This is a major constraint on the healthcare industry. Nationally, we have about 800,000 doctors growing at a minuscule rate of 1% annually, with nurses numbering about 1.4 million. Stretching this limited pool of professionals to care for an additional 47 million people will, in fact, lead to the most severe types of rationing of care. And with most of the healthcare cost from individuals coming at the end of life versus the beginning, who do you think will be most affected by rationing? The Elderly. That’s right… throw grandma under the bus. Ponder this scenario (keeping in mind that one of the main reasons the democrats give for a universal system is to restrain cost): There is a waiting list for a liver transplant and at present there are two individuals on the list: one the age of 28 and the other 64. Under a universal system that is specifically designed to curve cost, the government would mandate the 28 year-old receive the life saving transplant; not the 64 year-old. The reason is that, in the eyes of a government bureaucracy, the 28 year-old is seen as a better “investment”. The 28 year-old has more to contribute via a life of taxation, while the 64 year-old is nearing retirement. It’s an easy call for a bureaucrat whose main objective is to cut cost and generate revenue for the government. Sorry, Grandma. The scenario I used is fictional, but is a real possibility under a government-run health system. There have been hundreds of healthcare horror stories from individuals that live in countries that provide government healthcare and they are not pretty.
Stretching this limited pool of professionals to care for an additional 47 million people will, in fact, lead to the most severe types of rationing of care. And with most of the healthcare cost from individuals coming at the end of life versus the beginning, who do you think will be most affected by rationing? The Elderly. That’s right… throw grandma under the bus…
3. Medicare Cuts to Seniors
In the house democrat bill there is a provision to cut nearly 10% from Medicare over the coming years, adversely affecting those who have labored their entire lives and thought that they were entering into their golden years with a sense of security: Our Seniors. Not only will many of them receive less than stellar social security benefits, if any, but they will now be forced by the federal government to accept a lower quality of healthcare due to insufficient funding. Medicare barely covers the medical expenses for most seniors today; this is why the government allows seniors to combine Medicare coverage with “private” supplemental plans. But, if the Democrats get their way, Medicare will be cut by 10% and the ones who will suffer most will be the elderly. Why? Unbeknownst to most people, Medicare is not an “optional” healthcare plan for seniors; it is federally mandated. Senior citizens are automatically enrolled in Medicare once they reach the age of availability, whether they want to be or not. So, we force seniors into a system that is insufficient to care for their needs and then, on top of that, tell them we are cutting 10% of the funding?
In my next article on healthcare I will outline a conservative prospective with free market and cost effective solutions for healthcare reform in America. Contrasting points of view are encouraged. This issue is too serious for any of us to sit out on the sidelines…
Article posted courtesy of Jamal Greene and appears in eXcapethematriX magazine, Sept 09 issue
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
